Sign in / Sign Up About Us Contact Us

By Hand or Machine Driven?

Do clinicians need to use ultrasound insertion/tips to touch biofilms or stones to complete destruction?
Ultrasound and ultrasonic dental instruments remove calculus by layering rather than calculating the separation of the tooth-dentures. This is why, after using mechanical instruments, it is rare to see large amounts of calculi come out of the pockets. In order to be effective, the ultrasonic or ultrasonic instruments must be in direct contact with the calculus. In the process of removing the biofilm, fluid motion is effective near the tip of the instrument.Therefore,the clinician can not rely on the remote impact of the original, and needs to run the prompt on the entire root surface.
Is it manual or machine driven?
Q: do you need to use hand instruments to complement ultrasonic instruments during periodontal cleansing?
Acoustic/ultrasound devices in limited contact areas at the tip of the oscillating instrument (for example, the area around the front of the contact point) are useful.
In my opinion, if you want to zoom region can come into contact with the tip of the ultrasonic device, if all the calculus and biofilm were driven by machine equipment removed, then there is no need to use hand tools. One common method is to use hand tools to root. However, the study of surface roughness observed in machine-driven instrumentation or handheld devices found that the roughness of the instruments was low in either way. Therefore, it is not always necessary to use hand tools to achieve smooth surfaces after the machine-driven debridement.
Q: in some cases, is ultrasound alone enough?
Yes, as long as the clinician can fully remove all surfaces. Similar clinical results have been found in the study of ultrasound or acoustic detection alone by hand alone.
Air polishing
Please discuss the use of air polishing devices in instrumentation.
As the newly developed powder is made up of small crystals of amino acids, air polishing is a Renaissance. The first glycine powder was introduced in Europe. Compared with traditional sodium bicarbonate powder, it is about 80% less abrasive than conventional sodium bicarbonate, and can be safely applied to the root surface and gums to remove the biofilm under the superbiliary and subgingival. The biological membrane removed from the subgingivium, the purpose of water-air-powder injection is to enter the hole directly into the periodontal pocket (FIG. 1). Glycine air polishing powder (GPAP) is effective to remove biofilms and detection of periodontal pocket depth up to 4 mm. 5 patients with periodontal maintenance, periodontal GPAP results significantly reduce the number of microorganisms under the gum pockets and detecting depth is between 3 mm and 5 mm.
Another glycine powder is now available in the United States. According to the manufacturer, it is about 50 percent lower than the sodium bicarbonate powder.
Because of its low abrasiveness, GPAP does not rule out calculus. Ultrasound, ultrasound or chiral dental equipment are still needed to maintain the patient. Because in maintaining access between the new calculus is usually confined to the former, the tooth and tooth on the cutting area, so use GPAP remove supra - and subgingival biofilm, is an important part of periodontal maintenance process, greatly improving the efficiency. Some clinicians are starting to use GPAP for maintenance treatment to first remove all biofilms. This makes it easy to remove any calculus from the second step using a machine driver or manual tool. This contrarian instrument initially seemed counterintuitive, but effective in clinical practice. is one professional dental supplies website which supplies dental equipment in UK with competitive price and high quality.


This product hasn't received any reviews yet. Be the first to review this products.
  • Email Address:

  • Rank:

  • Content: